Saturday, August 5, 2017
Tuesday, July 4, 2017
Defiant
Saturday, April 7, 2012
Balance in Teaching
Although I wrote this a while back, I encountered it today.
A Response to
Dumbing Down Teachers, Henry A. Giroux, Truthout, May 26 2010.
A self reflective discipline in a vacuum of experience is useless. I didn't learn how to teach until years after I went through my "teacher training". I needed to step into reality. Without the days in the real classroom all my critical pedagogy was smoke in the wind. I also have seen the use of practical experience in learning with the students Giroux seems to champion. Those at risk students when involved in service learning which has a solid academic basis come up with some of the more profound insights into subject matter than I have seen in a "regular" classroom. I suggest that students should practice not just the critical thinking Giroux yearns for but the other two "c"'s - communication and collaboration. (21st Century Skills) If modern education lacks anything, it is this step into application of learning. That takes freedom of expression in class and a respect for opinion that models our ideals of democracy.
As to his defense of teacher unions and measures of teacher performance, I suggest that instructional methods need to be assessed in a responsible data driven, self-reflective manner. I have belonged to both major teacher unions in my time and the only advantage I had was the provision of legal representation. That and contract negotiation seem to be their most intent function. For those reasons I supported them. However, the practice of evaluation of teachers is inadequate and at times, criminal in benign neglect.
Practical application does not have to be joined with the repressive production of worker bees without the ability to consider the world. If my teaching were not grounded in my deep thought about the implications of my subject matter as well as my methods, I could not effectively function. Cookbook teaching is not teaching, in my opinion.
Giroux is right to note that "schools are dominated by a politics of fear, containment and authoritarianism" particularly for schools of color and poverty. This is a reflection of our society that does need to be addressed. Knowledge is power. Without that knowledge these students cannot escape the cycles of poverty and hopelessness that follow them to class. Ruby Payne's controversial theories of poverty and social culture forced me to look at the assumptions I had about a "proper" classroom.
It is certainly easier to focus on data, standards and testing than to grow an articulate, informed, literate, critical thinking citizen. The schools run like businesses do have something to offer. I would have liked to go to "work" at a creative place like Apple. There the experience informs the debate and opinion is based in experience as well as theory. That's what our kids need in school.
Teaching is a verb, a very active verb. Our kids deserve the best, all of them.
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Shoes, ships and sealing wax/ talking about information.
Fascinating statistics in the report on the Internet Librarian Conference provided by Lee Rainie from the Pew Internet Project. Looking forward to the results of the Gates grant he has received to study libraries and the new media. The speech is very interesting with lots of computer jokes but the statistics are staggering - information anytime, anywhere and any device is more than real. We have more cell phones (according to subscription) that we have people! 59% of adults connect to the Internet via mobile devices. So where do libraries and librarians particularly fit?
He has five basic questions:
1) What is the future of knowledge? 2) What is the future of reference expertise? 3) What is the future of public technology? 4) What is the future of learning spaces? 5) What is the future of community anchor institutions?
Having recently reviewed those bogus websites with my library college students, I see the second question as one that calls the most to my ponderings. The librarian as the "knowledge concierge" who guides those wandering out into the city of Internet information. Google is the big thing for my students, understandably. Google is consumer oriented and society is oriented to consume (still). So you get the immediate response and the lack of filter. The old acronym of GOGI applies. Garbage, garbage everywhere and who is going to think?
So the filtering and evaluation of the mass quantities of information is a special place for librarians to stand. To view librarians, especially in higher academic environments, as the expert in information is more and more challenging. Students seem to need to evaluate and locate useful information and want to do it online. Many faculty want to do this physically in a building with physical items. How to provide for both! The concept of the "embedded librarian" is held up once again in this presentation.
So see the article on: Pew Internet. http://pewinternet.org/Presentations/2011/Oct/Internet-Librarian.aspx
Friday, May 13, 2011
The Backchannel
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Dear Professor
Here it is spring of 2011 and I have taught three, almost four, online classes. All those things that I thought I would do, well, like any other class, I find I'm still working on them. I have placed video and links and visuals in to begin to reach some of my visual learners. However, the big changes I wanted - more interaction, more conversation, millions of links, assignments that were easier to grade. Well, they're still coming.
The most interesting piece for me is the similarities of class behavior. I began this teaching experience believing that "online" would be different. The answer is yes and no. Yes, there is no face to face and when, occasionally, I meet a student, the physical student may be different from how I imagined online. The online geek nerd boy doesn't wear glasses and looks like a football player. The sophisticated literate girl looks like she got her clothes at the thrift store and hasn't washed them. However, I still get the same number of "Dear Teacher" messages, although now they seem to think that calling me Professor has a sympathetic appeal. Some just call me "Nancy" and have a casual, buddy kind of approach. They all want something - a little more time, a little less work, the answers to the quiz before they take it. You would not believe the number of sick relatives, natural disasters, electrical outages and faulty computers one class can have.
But I slug along and every once in a while, I get an email after the class is over! And it says," Thank you. I learned something I never knew before. I think it might help me in the future."
So I'm still teaching. :)
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
The new Millennium?
Watch this!
